Skip to main content

Ember Journal Deep Dive

Author: Artyom Korzun

Overview

Ember uses a write-ahead logging mechanism for trading signals. This document describes the format of the Ember Journal, also known as the transaction log.

Ember 1.0 introduced a new format for the system journal that offers several considerable improvements:

  • Support for Snapshots - Snapshots significantly speed up the restart time for Ember itself and all downstream services like Monitor and Data Warehouse.
  • Data Partition Files - Instead of a single monolithic file, the new format introduces data partition files. These files allow the system to be configured to automatically and safely delete “old” partition files, optimizing storage management. Additionally, this procedure tracks journal consumers, such as a data warehousing service, ensuring that slow consumers will not lose data.

Journal Directory Structure

The journal is a transaction log that stores the history of trading operations. It lives in the Ember work directory under the journal directory and consists of three types of files: meta, data, and snapshot files.

  • The meta file contains “metadata” information that is used by the journal for ensuring data integrity and maintaining operation consistency.
  • The data file is a sequential partition of data with a fixed maximum size. By default, the size of each data file is 1 GB. When a data file is filled, a new one is created to continue recording further transactions.
  • A snapshot file contains a copy of messages that represent the current trading state at a specific point in time, serving as a point-in-time representation of the trading system's state and enabling efficient state recovery and analysis.

Snapshotting

Ember implements a state machine and the journal data files record all events that change this state. As time goes by, some of these events become non-essential for state recovery. For example, there is no need to retain a trade order that existed many weeks ago and never got filled.

During run time, Ember keeps the following trading state in memory:

  • All active orders
  • Last N completed orders for each client
  • Positions and risk rules state
note

The Data Warehousing pipeline can be configured to record all trading orders and events into long term storage.

note

As the system runs, past fills are compressed into position sizes in Ember’s memory.

Snapshot files store a copy of messages that recover the current trading state. Each subsequent snapshot includes new orders and may remove some completed orders. It helps speed up the restart time for Ember and downstream services.

Important: Please never delete or modify any of the journal files manually. Indexes on data files and snapshot files are not directly related. Only the “compactor” tool described below should be used to manage files in the journal directory.

A typical journal directory structure might look like this:

  • meta
  • data0
  • data1
  • data2
  • data3
  • snapshot0 (contains the data from data0)
  • snapshot2 (contains the data from snapshot0, data1 and data2)

This directory content can be illustrated using the following diagram:

Ember Journal diagram

Here is another example showing the content of a journal directory from one of Ember's stress tests:

[centos@ip-10-0-0-62 ~]$ ls -l /deltix/emberhome/journal/
total 3700960
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 1073741824 Apr 10 15:27 data11613
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 1073741824 Apr 10 15:28 data11614
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 1073741824 Apr 10 15:29 data11615
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 545259520 Apr 10 15:29 data11616
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 1792 Apr 10 15:28 meta
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 23291024 Apr 10 15:28 snapshot11613
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 256 Apr 10 15:29 snapshot11615.16297.temp

Here you can see that each data file is 1Gb in size. The system automatically deleted datafiles 0 - 11612 since they already have already been recorded into snapshot 11613. The snapshot for this particular trading history took approximately 23 megabytes, as the system had about 30K active orders.

Warehousing

A journal grows constantly over time, especially with a high operation rate. On startup, Ember replays the entire journal to restore the system state. However, some data, like old inactive orders, may no longer be needed and can be removed to reduce the journal's size. This filtered content can be saved as a separate “snapshot” file.

If there are snapshots on startup, Ember loads its state from the latest snapshot and then reads partitions after it. This approach dramatically reduces startup time. Ember satellite processes, such as Ember Monitor or Data Warehouse, also benefit from using snapshots.

You can set up the Data Warehouse service to stream the journal to a data storage system in order to save the entire trading history and perform post-processing on the data. This way, partitions can be safely removed from the journal, but the data will live in another place.

Ember Journal warehouses

For more information about Data Warehouse solutions, see the Data Warehouse document.

Compaction

The Compactor is a background service that can take snapshots and delete old snapshots and partitions. You can find the journal-compaction script in the Ember distribution package.

Configuration Settings

The script has the following settings in ember.conf:

compaction {

# Automatically delete “old” data partitions
# if you do not need to preserve full operation history on a disk
deletePartitions = false

# Keep at least N of the last snapshots (min is 2)
keepSnapshotsAtLeast = 2

# null means auto-discovery or use explicit file paths like ["a", "b"]
fences = null

# Sleep period between checks for taking a new snapshot and deleting old files
idlePeriod = 1m

}

Diagram

The following diagram shows the effect of journal compaction, including warehouse fencing:

Journal diagram with warehouse fencing

Managing Data Partitions and Snapshots

If you do not require the whole history, including “empty orders”, to be preserved on a disk, you can configure the Compactor to delete data partitions that are not directly needed for Ember operation using the deletePartitions setting.

Snapshots are deleted in sequential order. Partitions are also deleted in sequential order but only when at least one snapshot is deleted.

Fences

A fence is a file used to determine whether snapshots and partitions can be deleted or not. Currently, there are only two service types that use this feature: Warehouse and DropCopy.

If the fences are not explicitly specified, the service discovers them via the configuration. A service restart is required when Warehouse/DropCopy are added or removed.

caution

If you delete services from the config, ensure that you also delete the corresponding fence files manually.

Journal Archiver

note

Please note that while Ember is running, the only way to create an archive of the journal is by using the Archiver tool.

The Archiver tool compresses and decompresses a journal into and from an archive format. Within the Ember distribution package, you can find two scripts: journal-compress and journal-decompress:

  • journal-compress - This script takes the earliest snapshot with partitions and compresses them into an archive named journal.archive, stored in the Ember work directory.
  • journal-decompress - decompresses the contents of journal.archive back into the journal directory. When usin this tool, ensure that the journal directory does not exist prior to decompression.

For more information, visit the journal-compress & journal-decompress tool page.

Periodic Flush

Ember employs memory-mapped files for writing journal data. The operating system ensures that data is flushed to disk even if the Ember process crashes. However, in the event of a sudden server shutdown, such as a sudden server death, Ember might encounter data loss for a recent portion of journaled data.

To address this, one potential solution is to force a flush of every trading signal to disk prior to processing. This "force flush" can be time-consuming and is generally avoided by latency-oriented systems due to the performance impact.

An alternative approach is the implementation of a periodic journal flush:

# Interval to force a periodic journal flush (or 0  = disable periodic force flush)
journal.forceFlushInterval = 15s
caution

We advise against using this feature in cloud environments or reliable data centers that provide redundant power.

For practical alternatives to periodic flushing, consider the following options:

  • Running an Ember cluster - Performs synchronous replication of trading signals. While this alternative raises operational costs, it provides a hot failover mechanism in case of primary server loss.
  • Running an asynchronous Journal Replica service - Refer to the Ember Disaster Recovery document for details on implementing this service.
  • Running a low latency data warehouse - (For example, streaming trading activity to TimeBase located on a separate server). In the event of journal data loss, data can be recovered using the journal-import tool.

Human-readable Format

To facilitate human readability, you can employ two scripts: journal-to-json for converting binary journal data to JSON format, and journal-from-json for reversing the process.

Note that these tools rely on the EMBER_WORK (or EMBER_HOME) environment variables to locate journal. The only command line argument required is the destination JSON file (or the source JSON file accordingly).

Data Warehouse

For long term storage, it is possible to stream journal entries into data warehouse solutions like ClickHouse. Refer to the Streaming Ember Messages to ClickHouse document for more information on this process.

Load Test

In this section, we present statistics obtained from a prolonged stress test lasting 20 days. The stress test was conducted on a Matching Engine that received simulated client load. Throughout the test, the system recorded 100 billion trading requests and experienced a variety of trading workflows, including fills, cancellations, and rejects.

Here are the statistics recorded:

119,453,646,240 - Ember.Requests
155,554,802,873 - Ember.Events
92,230,355,523 - Ember.TotalOrders
49,095,984,555 - Ember.TotalTrades

Over the course of this test, the system processed 50 terabytes of journaled data:

ls -l /deltix/emberhome/journal/home

-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos 1073741824 Apr 30 16:48 data50980
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos  847249408 Apr 30 16:49 data50981
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos       1792 Apr 30 16:49 meta
-rw-r--r-- 1 centos centos   33401936 Apr 30 16:48 snapshot50980

Real-Life Example

This example was taken from a Market Maker client. The Journal in this instance contains approximately 2GB of data:

11/20/2020  11:42 AM     1,073,741,824 data0
11/20/2020  11:42 AM     1,073,741,824 data1
11/20/2020  11:42 AM        50,331,648 data2
11/20/2020  11:42 AM             1,792 meta
               4 File(s)  2,197,817,088 bytes

During startup, Ember took around 25 seconds to read the journal:

23 Nov 17:49:15.804 INFO [trade-engine] EMBER is loading journal. Snapshot: no.
[…]
23 Nov 17:49:40.342 INFO [trade-engine] EMBER has loaded journal. Messages: 9187841.

Here's another snapshot from a production environment, taken from one of the clients. In this case, the system generated 7592 data partitions. Partitions of around 1GB each were filled in approximately 30 minutes:

drwxr-xr-x. 6 dx_support dx_support        198 Jul 23 00:11 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support  408998768 Jul 23 13:15 snapshot7590
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support 1073741824 Jul 23 14:00 data7591
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support  398382112 Jul 23 14:00 snapshot7591
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support 1073741824 Jul 23 14:46 data7592
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support       1024 Jul 23 14:46 fence-warehouse-marketmaker
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support  395913832 Jul 23 14:47 snapshot7592
drwx------  2 dx_support dx_support        161 Jul 23 14:47 .
-rw-rw-r--  1 dx_support dx_support       1792 Jul 23 14:51 meta
-rw-r--r--  1 dx_support dx_support  159383552 Jul 23 14:51 data7593

Appendix A. Early Journal Model

Prior to Ember 1.0, a simpler version of journaling was used. While not exactly the same, this early diagram can illustrate how Ember works with journal files.

Early drawing of Ember journal